← Back to rankings
AUS

Clem Hill

160
v EnglandAdelaide1908
Second inningsvs EnglandGolden era

Clem Hill made 160 against England at Adelaide in 1908.

Was it a ton of consequence?

Not enough match data yet to say. We can only judge hundreds where we have the match record, which is mostly from 2006 on. How it works

How the score is builtscore · points

Match Impact30% weight+19.565
Clutchness22% weight+16.173
Narrative18% weight+12.268
Conditions & Opposition14% weight+9.266
Historical Weight10% weight+9.898
Perceived Greatness6% weight+4.473
ToC score on your weighting71.2

Your weighting

  • Match Impact30%Did it decide the course of the game?
  • Clutchness22%The weight of pressure in the moment
  • Narrative18%The story surrounding the innings
  • Conditions & Opposition14%What and who they were up against
  • Historical Weight10%How time and experts have judged it
  • Perceived Greatness6%The consensus of those who watched
Change it on the rankings page

How divisive is it?

Universally great, 12. Almost everyone agrees. This innings transcends the debate. Across five points of view it scores between 69.1 and 76.4.

More from Clem Hill

142 v South Africa
Johannesburg · 1902 · 305th overall69.4191 v South Africa
Sydney · 1910 · 393rd overall68.3188 v England
Melbourne · 1898 · 421st overall68.0119 v England
Sheffield · 1902 · 505th overall67.3100 v South Africa
Melbourne · 1911 · 688th overall65.7135 v England
Lord's · 1899 · 1064th overall63.4
Rankings