Andrew Flintoff
5 Test hundreds. Of the 4 we can measure, 0 were tons of consequence. The other 1 are before the ball-by-ball record, so we do not have enough match data yet.
Who against, and where
| Hundreds | Tons of consequence | |
|---|---|---|
| Top tier (England, Australia, India) | 1 | 0 |
| Second tier (New Zealand, South Africa) | 2 | 0 |
| Third tier (Sri Lanka, West Indies, Pakistan) | 2 | 0 |
| At home | 2 | 0 |
| Away | 1 | 0 |
The tiers are a fixed grouping of countries, not a rating on the day. Where it was played is only known for the hundreds we have the match record for.
Every hundred
137 v New Zealand, Christchurch, 2002 · Won
Not enough match data yet to say.
142 v South Africa, Lord's, 2003 · Lost
A good ton. A loss: even a great hundred can't be a ton of consequence in a defeat.
167 v West Indies, Birmingham, 2004 · At home · Won
A good ton. His side already led by 210 when the innings began. He made 30% of the team's runs. The match didn't hinge on it: he came in at 4 for 210.
102* v West Indies, St John's, 2004 · Away · Drawn
A good ton. A draw against a lower-tier side: a hundred doesn't save a draw against a side like that.
102 v Australia, Nottingham, 2005 · At home · Won
A good ton. His side already led by 213 when the innings began. He made 21% of the team's runs. The match didn't hinge on it: he came in at 4 for 213.