Frank Worrell
9 Test hundreds. Of the 6 we can measure, 0 were tons of consequence. The other 3 are before the ball-by-ball record, so we do not have enough match data yet.
Who against, and where
| Hundreds | Tons of consequence | |
|---|---|---|
| Top tier (England, Australia, India) | 8 | 0 |
| Second tier (New Zealand, South Africa) | 1 | 0 |
The tiers are a fixed grouping of countries, not a rating on the day. Where it was played is only known for the hundreds we have the match record for.
Every hundred
131* v England, Georgetown, 1948 · Won
A good ton. He made 44% of the team's runs. On the facts we have, the match didn't hinge on it.
261 v England, Nottingham, 1950 · Won
Not enough match data yet to say.
138 v England, The Oval, 1950 · Won
A good ton. He made 27% of the team's runs. On the facts we have, the match didn't hinge on it.
108 v Australia, Melbourne, 1951 · Lost
A good ton. A loss: even a great hundred can't be a ton of consequence in a defeat.
100 v New Zealand, Auckland, 1952 · Drawn
Not enough match data yet to say.
237 v India, Kingston, 1953 · Drawn
A good ton. The match was drawn. A draw in which his side was not behind when the innings began, so it was not in danger of losing.
167 v England, Port of Spain, 1954 · Drawn
Not enough match data yet to say.
191* v England, Nottingham, 1957 · Drawn
A good ton. A draw: without a ball-by-ball record we cannot say the hundred saved it.
197* v England, Bridgetown, 1960 · Drawn
A good ton. A draw: without a ball-by-ball record we cannot say the hundred saved it.