Jacques Rudolph
6 Test hundreds. Of the 4 we can measure, 0 were tons of consequence. The other 2 are before the ball-by-ball record, so we do not have enough match data yet.
Who against, and where
| Hundreds | Tons of consequence | |
|---|---|---|
| Top tier (England, Australia, India) | 1 | 0 |
| Second tier (New Zealand, South Africa) | 3 | 0 |
| Third tier (Sri Lanka, West Indies, Pakistan) | 1 | 0 |
| Other (Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Ireland, Afghanistan and the rest) | 1 | 0 |
| Away | 2 | 0 |
The tiers are a fixed grouping of countries, not a rating on the day. Where it was played is only known for the hundreds we have the match record for.
Every hundred
222* v Bangladesh, Chattogram, 2003
Not enough match data yet to say.
154* v New Zealand, Auckland, 2004 · Away · Lost
A good ton. A loss: even a great hundred can't be a ton of consequence in a defeat.
102 v Sri Lanka, Galle, 2004 · Drawn
A good ton. The match was drawn. Without a ball-by-ball record we can't say the hundred saved it.
101 v West Indies, Cape Town, 2004 · Drawn
Not enough match data yet to say.
102* v Australia, W.A.C.A, 2005 · Drawn
A good ton. The match was drawn. Without a ball-by-ball record we can't say the hundred saved it.
105* v New Zealand, Dunedin, 2012 · Away · Drawn
A good ton. A draw, and his side was never in danger of losing, so the hundred didn't save anything.