Jonathan Trott
9 Test hundreds. Of the 9 we can measure, 4 were tons of consequence.
Who against, and where
| Hundreds | Tons of consequence | |
|---|---|---|
| Top tier (England, Australia, India) | 4 | 1 |
| Second tier (New Zealand, South Africa) | 1 | 0 |
| Third tier (Sri Lanka, West Indies, Pakistan) | 3 | 2 |
| Other (Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Ireland, Afghanistan and the rest) | 1 | 1 |
| At home | 4 | 3 |
| Away | 5 | 1 |
The tiers are a fixed grouping of countries, not a rating on the day. Where it was played is only known for the hundreds we have the match record for.
Every hundred
119 v Australia, The Oval, 2009 · At home · Won
A good ton. The team was already 211 ahead when he came in.
226 v Bangladesh, Lord's, 2010 · At home · Won
A ton of consequence: carried the innings. He scored 45% of the team's runs.
184 v Pakistan, Lord's, 2010 · At home · Won
A ton of consequence: rescued the innings. 5 wickets fell around him while the team was under 200.
168* v Australia, Melbourne, 2010 · Away · Won
A good ton. No: he came in comfortably and the team did not depend on him.
135* v Australia, Brisbane, 2010 · Away · Drawn
A ton of consequence: saved the match. He saved the match.
203 v Sri Lanka, Cardiff, 2011 · At home · Won
A ton of consequence: carried the innings. He scored 41% of the team's runs.
143 v India, Nagpur, 2012 · Away · Drawn
A good ton. A draw, and the team was never in danger of losing.
112 v Sri Lanka, Galle, 2012 · Away · Lost
A good ton. The team lost.
121 v New Zealand, Wellington, 2013 · Away · Drawn
A good ton. A draw, and the team was never in danger of losing.