Wasim Jaffer
5 Test hundreds. Of the 5 we can measure, 0 were tons of consequence.
Who against, and where
| Hundreds | Tons of consequence | |
|---|---|---|
| Top tier (England, Australia, India) | 1 | 0 |
| Second tier (New Zealand, South Africa) | 1 | 0 |
| Third tier (Sri Lanka, West Indies, Pakistan) | 2 | 0 |
| Other (Bangladesh, Zimbabwe, Ireland, Afghanistan and the rest) | 1 | 0 |
| At home | 2 | 0 |
| Away | 3 | 0 |
The tiers are a fixed grouping of countries, not a rating on the day. Where it was played is only known for the hundreds we have the match record for.
Every hundred
212 v West Indies, St John's, 2006 · Away · Drawn
A good ton. The match was drawn, and on the facts we have the hundred didn't save it.
100 v England, Nagpur, 2006 · At home · Drawn
A good ton. The match was drawn. On the facts we have, the match didn't hinge on it.
202 v Pakistan, Eden Gardens, 2007 · At home · Drawn
A good ton. A draw against a lower-tier side: a hundred doesn't save a draw against a side like that.
138* v Bangladesh, Mirpur, 2007 · Away · Won
A good ton. He made 23% of the team's runs. The match didn't hinge on it: he came in at 0 for 0.
116 v South Africa, Cape Town, 2007 · Away · Lost
A good ton. A loss: even a great hundred can't be a ton of consequence in a defeat.